Service of show-cause notice and incomplete record scrutiny led to remand for fresh adjudication after original records review.

Service of the show-cause notice was not accepted as finally established where the supporting record was incomplete and RTI material cast doubt on the issuing register and service particulars. Because the original records and the appellants' submissions had not been properly examined, the factual foundation of the impugned order was found insufficient. The order was therefore set aside and the matter remanded for fresh adjudication after calling for the original records and giving the parties a hearing.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the finding that the show-cause notice had been issued and served was sustainable in view of the material produced by the appellants; (ii) Whether the matter required remand because the relevant records and submissions had not been properly examined.

Issue (i): Whether the finding that the show-cause notice had been issued and served was sustainable in view of the material produced by the appellants.

Analysis: The record disclosed a claim that the documents accompanying the goods had been taken away at the border and that the claim for the goods had been made shortly after seizure. The information obtained under the Right to Information Act also indicated that the issuing register did not support the existence of the postage stamp and addressee particulars relied upon to infer service of the notice.

Conclusion: The finding regarding issuance and service of the show-cause notice was not accepted as final and was found to require reconsideration.

Issue (ii): Whether the matter required remand because the relevant records and submissions had not been properly examined.

Analysis: The earlier authorities had not adequately examined the original records or considered the appellants' material submissions, and the factual foundation of the impugned order was found to be incomplete.

Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after calling for the original records and granting an opportunity of hearing.

Final Conclusion: The appeals succeeded to the extent that the impugned order was vacated and the matter sent back for fresh decision on a proper factual record.

Ratio Decidendi: Where material evidence shows that the foundational facts supporting adjudication have not been properly verified, the matter must be remanded for fresh consideration after examining the original records and affording a fair hearing.

---