Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an appeal under Regulation 22 of the Customs House Agent's Licensing Regulation, 2004 is maintainable at the instance of an ex-employee of a Customs House Agent.
Analysis: The appellate remedy under Regulation 22 is available to a Customs House Agent aggrieved by an order passed under Regulation 20 or Regulation 22(7). The appellant was not a Customs House Agent but only an ex-employee, and no appeal had been filed by the Customs House Agent itself. Since the statutory provision confers the right of appeal on a specified class of person, the appellant did not fall within the category entitled to prefer the appeal.
Conclusion: The appeal was not maintainable and was dismissed.