Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported machine cloth pieces were correctly classified for the purpose of additional duty of customs and whether any countervailing duty was leviable on them.
Analysis: The imported goods were described and accepted as pieces of machine cloth cut to size for direct fitting to machinery, and not as textile fabrics for general use. On that basis, the proper treatment for additional duty was under the tariff entry applicable to goods of the nature of machine parts rather than under the entries adopted by the lower authorities. The goods were held to fall under Tariff Item 68 for the purpose of countervailing duty, and it was noted that at the relevant time no countervailing duty existed for that item.
Conclusion: The goods were not liable to countervailing duty or additional duty of customs, and the appeal succeeded.