Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether phenolic resin lamp capping cement Grade PR/707, containing marble dust as an inorganic filler, fell within the expression "phenolic resin" in Notification No. 122/71-C.E. and was eligible to concessional assessment.
Analysis: The notification covered synthetic resins manufactured from phenols and aldehydes and included chemically modified phenolic resins and liquid phenolic resins, but excluded only blends of phenolic resins with other artificial and synthetic resins. The sample was found to contain phenol formaldehyde synthetic resin with inorganic filler, namely marble dust. The decisive question was whether the filler created a disqualifying blend. The absence of any other artificial or synthetic resin, and the fact that marble dust was merely a filler, meant that the product was not taken out of the notification. The earlier rejection proceeded on an incorrect understanding of the notification and of the effect of the filler.
Conclusion: The product remained a phenolic resin for the purposes of Notification No. 122/71-C.E. and was entitled to concessional assessment.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the order denying the concession was set aside, with the product directed to be assessed under the notification.
Ratio Decidendi: A phenolic resin does not cease to fall within a concessional exemption merely because it contains an inorganic filler, unless it is blended with another artificial or synthetic resin.