TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal rules on classification of imported insulating material under Customs Tariff</h1> <h3>CROMPTON GREAVES LTD. Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS</h3> CROMPTON GREAVES LTD. Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS - 1989 (43) E.L.T. 788 (Tribunal) Issues: Classification of imported insulating material under Customs and Central Excise Tariff, applicability of essential character rule, countervailing duty classification under Central Excise Tariff.Classification under Customs and Central Excise Tariff:The case involved the classification of imported insulating material by M/s Crompton Greaves Ltd. Bombay under the Customs and Central Excise Tariff. The Appellant contended that the material should be assessed under specific tariff items, while the Revenue Authorities classified it differently. The dispute centered around whether the imported goods fell under Item 15A(2) of the Central Excise Tariff or under a different category. The Assistant Collector of Customs and the Appellate Collector of Customs upheld the classification under Item 15A(2), leading to the appeal before the Tribunal.Application of Essential Character Rule:The Appellant argued that the classification should be based on the material that gives the goods their essential character, citing previous judgments of the CEGAT. They emphasized that the composition of the imported item, with a significant portion of paper compared to plastic, should determine its classification. Referring to Rule 3(b) of the rules for interpretation of the Customs Tariff Act, the Appellant sought classification under a specific tariff item based on the essential character of the goods.Countervailing Duty Classification:The issue of countervailing duty classification was also raised in the appeal. The Appellant contended that the goods should be classified under Tariff Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff for countervailing duty purposes. The Tribunal referred to previous judgments to determine the appropriate heading for countervailing duty classification. It was observed that the Appellate Collector erred in not considering the Appellant's argument regarding the countervailing duty classification under Tariff Item 68 earlier. The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal and directed the lower authorities to provide consequential relief based on the revised classification.Conclusion:The Tribunal, after considering the arguments and precedents cited by both parties, held in favor of the Appellant. The classification of the imported insulating material was determined based on the essential character rule, emphasizing the composition of the material. The Tribunal also addressed the countervailing duty classification issue, directing the reclassification of the goods under Tariff Item 68. The judgment provided clarity on the classification of the imported goods under the Customs and Central Excise Tariff, ensuring compliance with the applicable tariff provisions and rules.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
