Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether flame proof well glasses were eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 106/77-Cus. in view of their classification under Chapter 85 of the Customs Tariff Act.
Analysis: The appeal turned on whether the goods could be treated as lighting fittings falling within Chapter 85 so as to attract the exemption under Notification No. 106/77-Cus. The prior decision in the same appellant's case had already held that the goods were outer glass shells or glass envelopes for electric lamps used in mines, and that such goods were specifically excluded from Chapter 85 by the tariff notes. The Tribunal held that the notification extended only to lighting fittings which themselves fell within Chapter 85, and that a later contention based on CVD assessment under Tariff Item 23A could not alter the basic customs classification, because the exclusion under Chapter 85 remained controlling for exemption purposes.
Conclusion: The goods were not eligible for the benefit of Notification No. 106/77-Cus., and the appeal failed.