Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether inner-tube valves imported by the appellants were classifiable under Heading No. 84.61(1) of the Customs Tariff Act or under sub-heading (2) of the same heading.
Analysis: The Tribunal noted that an earlier order had already classified tube valves of the same kind under sub-heading (1) of Heading 84.61. As the goods involved in the present appeals were the same, the Tribunal found no reason to depart from that view and followed the earlier classification.
Conclusion: The goods were held classifiable under Heading No. 84.61(1), not under sub-heading (2), and the challenge to re-classification failed.
Final Conclusion: The classification adopted by the customs authorities was sustained and the appeals were rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are identical to goods already classified in an earlier binding or followed order, the same tariff classification should be applied unless a distinguishing basis is shown.