Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported computer interface qualified as a computer peripheral unit entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 115/80-Cus. and Notification No. 41/80-Cus.
Analysis: The goods were assessed under Heading 84.51/55(2) of the Customs Tariff Act and the claim for exemption under the two notifications was rejected by the customs authorities. On hearing both sides, the authority accepted that the interface was a peripheral for the computer. The notifications granted partial exemption from basic customs duty and full exemption from auxiliary duty to computer peripheral units falling under sub-heading No. 2 of Heading 84.51/55.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to the benefit of both notifications.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the exemption claim was upheld with consequential relief.
Ratio Decidendi: A computer interface that functions as a peripheral unit of a computer is covered by exemption notifications applicable to computer peripheral units under the relevant customs tariff heading.