Tariff classification of relays under specific headings defeats exemption tied to the general equipment heading.

Imported motor relays and thermo flasher relays were analysed on tariff classification principles under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The text applies Note 2(a) to Section XVI to hold that goods covered by a specific relay heading must be classified under that specific entry rather than under Heading 85.16. Thermo flasher relays were treated as relays falling outside Heading 85.16, so the exemption linked to that heading did not apply. Motor relays were also found not to fall under Heading 85.16; their motors, if separately considered, attracted Heading 85.01(2), with no change to the duty already assessed. The lower authorities' classification and assessment were therefore maintained.

---

---

Issues: Whether the imported Motor Relays and Thermo Flasher Relays were classifiable under Heading 85.16 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 so as to qualify for exemption under Notification No. 288/76-Cus. dated 02-08-1976, or were required to be classified under the specific relay headings.

Analysis: The dispute turned on tariff classification of the goods and the effect of Note 2(a) to Section XVI of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Thermo Flasher Relays were found to be relays falling under the specific relay heading and, therefore, not eligible to be classified under Heading 85.16. The exemption notification, being tied to equipment falling under Heading 85.16, could not apply to them. As regards Motor Relays, even if they contained motors, the motors were of 220 volts and would attract Heading 85.01(2), which carried the same duty already assessed; in any event, they also did not fall under Heading 85.16. The statutory scheme required goods with a specific tariff entry to be classified under that entry rather than under the main equipment heading.

Conclusion: The imported items were not classifiable under Heading 85.16 for the purpose of the exemption notification, and the lower authorities' assessment was upheld.

Final Conclusion: The appeal failed on tariff classification and exemption entitlement, leaving the duty assessment made by the lower authorities undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where a tariff item has a specific heading, classification must be made under that specific heading and not under a general equipment heading, and an exemption linked to the general heading will not apply.

---