Pre-deposit dispensation must be decided before dismissing an appeal; remand ordered for decision on merits.

Dismissal of an appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement was improper where the application for dispensation from prior deposit had not been decided on merits. The appeal could not be finally rejected without first disposing of that request and giving the appellants an adequate opportunity to comply with any deposit direction, particularly where confiscation, redemption fine and penalty were under challenge. The dismissal order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the appellate authority to consider the dispensation application and decide the appeal on merits.

---

---

Issues: Whether dismissal of the appeal for non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement, without first disposing of the application for dispensation, was lawful, and whether the matter should be remanded for hearing on merits.

Analysis: The appeal had been dismissed because the appellants did not produce proof of compliance with the pre-deposit requirement. However, the record did not show that the application seeking dispensation from prior deposit had been decided on merits. The dismissal was therefore made without proper disposal of the dispensation request and without affording adequate opportunity to comply with any deposit direction. As the confiscation, fine in lieu of confiscation, and penalty were all under challenge, the appeal could not be finally rejected in that manner.

Conclusion: The dismissal order was set aside and the matter was remanded to the Collector (Appeals) to decide the appeal on merits after considering the application for dispensation and giving adequate opportunity to the appellants.

---