Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported gear internal parts used for hoisting crane were classifiable under heading 84.22 or under heading 84.63 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
Analysis: The goods were described as gears and gearings, and the appellate authority had found that they were specifically designed for use in a hoisting crane. In the light of Section Note 2(a) to Section XVI of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, goods falling within the description of gears and gearings were appropriately classified under heading 84.63 rather than the heading claimed by the importer.
Conclusion: The classification under heading 84.63 was upheld and the importer's claim for re-classification under heading 84.22 was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed on the question of tariff classification, and the departmental classification was confirmed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where imported goods are specifically describable as gears and gearings, Section Note 2(a) to Section XVI of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 governs their classification under the appropriate heading.