Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pre-deposit of duty and penalty should be dispensed with in a stay application, and whether recovery of the disputed amounts should be stayed pending disposal of the appeal.
Analysis: The request for waiver was supported by the plea that the product was covered by exemption notifications and by earlier Tribunal orders in similar matters. The application was pressed on the basis of a strong prima facie case, and no plea of financial hardship was advanced. In view of the earlier Tribunal decisions relied upon, the case was considered fit for waiver of pre-deposit and for protection against recovery until the appeal was heard.
Outcome: Pre-deposit of duty and penalty was dispensed with and recovery was stayed till hearing of the main appeal. The appeal was directed to be listed for hearing on merits.