Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amendment inserting "portable generators" in the relevant import policy provisions operated prospectively or retrospectively, and whether the impugned show cause notice, adjudication order and appellate order were liable to be quashed.
Analysis: The controversy turned on the effect of two public notices issued on 27 July 1981 and 29 July 1981. The earlier notice amended the policy so that export houses could import alternators/generators including portable generators against additional licences, while the later notice added portable generators to the restricted list. The Court held that the later amendment could not be treated as clarificatory or retrospective so as to defeat firm commitments and import rights that had accrued during the interregnum. The Court also relied on the clarification obtained from the technical authority and on the prior appellate decision dealing with an identical issue, which supported the view that portable generators were not to be equated with generators for the restrictive provision.
Conclusion: The amendment operated prospectively only, portable generators were importable under the additional licence during the relevant period, and the impugned customs proceedings were unsustainable and liable to be quashed.