Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported winding temperature indicators and oil temperature indicators were entitled to concessional assessment under Notification No. 37/79 to the extent they were supported by end-use and DGTD certification.
Analysis: The goods were claimed as component parts of transformers and the concession under the notification was sought on the basis that they were required for manufacture of power transformers. The record showed an end-use affidavit, DGTD certificate, and other supporting documents. The departmental position accepted reassessment only for the quantity covered by the DGTD certificate, and the Bench found the documentary evidence sufficient for that limited extent.
Conclusion: The concession and re-assessment were allowed only for the goods covered by the DGTD certificate, namely 40 winding temperature indicators.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the limited extent of the certified quantity, with the remaining claim not accepted.
Ratio Decidendi: Where documentary evidence establishes that imported goods are specifically covered for end-use in manufacture and the supporting certificate is quantity-limited, concessional assessment may be granted only to the extent of the certified coverage.