Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the exemption under Notification No. 142/78-Central Excises could be extended on the basis of a notional licensed capacity, and whether the subsequent amendment under Notification No. 152/79 altered the restriction applicable to clearances for the relevant year.
Analysis: The exemption notification linked concessional duty to the factory's licensed capacity or installed capacity as certified by the Development Officer of the Directorate General of Technical Development. The industrial policy press notes permitting production increases up to 25% did not modify the terms of the notification, and there was no basis for reading into it a concept of notional licensed capacity. The amendment made by Notification No. 152/79 introduced specific changes, but left the relevant restriction under the original notification otherwise intact for the period in question.
Conclusion: The claim for exemption based on notional licensed capacity was not sustainable, and the restriction in the notification remained applicable. The issue was decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification granting concessional duty with reference to licensed or installed capacity must be construed strictly, and its terms cannot be enlarged by importing a notional capacity concept from industrial policy materials unless the notification itself so provides.