Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether permission under Rule 56A(7) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 could be granted to send duty-paid inputs from the respondent's factory to another factory for manufacture of alkyd resin, an intermediate product, and to receive the resin back for manufacture of paints and varnishes.
Analysis: Rule 56A(7) is an enabling provision for removal of partially processed goods outside the factory for tests, repairs, refining, reconditioning, or other operations necessary for manufacture. The scope of "other operations" has to be read in light of the processes specifically mentioned in the rule. The Tribunal held that where the second factory produces a marketable product, permission under the rule is not ordinarily available. It further held that what is not admissible directly under the rule or under Notification No. 201/79 cannot be permitted indirectly by sending inputs to another factory for production of an intermediate product. The Tribunal also noted that the inputs had not been shown to be partially processed before removal to the second factory.
Conclusion: The refusal of permission was and the respondent was not entitled to permission under Rule 56A(7).
Ratio Decidendi: Rule 56A(7) does not permit removal of unprocessed inputs to another factory for manufacture of a marketable intermediate product when such a course would indirectly secure a concession that is not available directly and the goods are not shown to be partially processed.