Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the deceased's life interest in settled properties ceased on her death so as to attract estate duty, and how the beneficial interest passing on death was to be valued for assessment purposes.
Analysis: Under the settlement deed, the deceased held only a life interest, with the next life estate going to the son. On the deceased's death, the life interest ceased and the resulting benefit passed to the son, bringing the interest within the charging provision for property passing on death. For valuation, where the interest extended to the whole income of the property, the statutory rule required the principal value of the property to be taken. The principal value had to be estimated on the basis of the price it would fetch in the open market at the time of death, understood as a moment after death, and the subsisting life interest of the son had to be taken into account as depressing market value.
Conclusion: The deceased's beneficial interest was chargeable to estate duty, but the valuation had to be revised by assessing the property's principal value after allowing for the son's life interest.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a deceased held only a life interest extending to the whole income of the property, the cessation of that interest on death attracts estate duty, and the property must be valued at its open-market principal value as at a moment after death, with any subsisting subordinate life interest reflected in the valuation.