Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the value of the assessee's 1/6th share in the property was required to be increased by 10 per cent over the earlier year's valuation, or whether the same value should be retained on the basis of actual rent realised.
Analysis: The earlier Tribunal order had treated the actual rent, and not any notional rent, as the proper basis for capitalising the annual income of the property. On that footing, and in the absence of any increase in the rent received during the relevant year, there was no justification for adopting a higher valuation than the one accepted for the earlier year. The assessee's valuation working also showed no basis for enhancement merely by adding 10 per cent.
Conclusion: The value of the assessee's 1/6th share was to be retained at Rs. 4,40,495 and the proposed enhancement was rejected.