Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether amounts already brought to tax or disallowed under one deeming provision of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 could again be included or disallowed by applying another deeming provision to the same property.
Analysis: Sections 9, 10 and 46(1) are anti-avoidance deeming provisions intended to counter transactions that would otherwise keep property outside the estate duty net. Each provision operates by treating the concerned property as part of the deceased's estate where the statutory conditions are satisfied. The same gifted property may fall within more than one deeming clause, and the provisions may be invoked alternatively or even conjunctively to identify whether the property is to be treated as passing on death. However, once the value of a particular property has been included by applying one applicable provision, there remains nothing further to include by invoking another provision in respect of the same property.
Conclusion: The same amount could not be included twice by resorting to sections 9 and 10 and again by section 46(1) for the same property; the departmental objection failed.