Excise licence conditions and partnership validity: absence of prior permission did not make the firm illegal or bar registration.

Formation of a partnership to conduct country liquor business was not rendered illegal merely because prior written permission of the excise authorities had not been obtained. The licence remained in the name of one partner, was not transferred to the firm, and the business continued under that partner's management, with the other partner acting as a financier. Since the excise law provided separate consequences for breach of licence conditions, namely fine or cancellation of licence, the arrangement was not treated as an agreement forbidden by law or opposed to public policy. The firm was therefore valid in law and entitled to registration, and the objection based on section 23 of the Indian Contract Act failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the partnership firm was validly constituted and entitled to registration despite being formed without prior written permission of the excise authorities and the objection that the arrangement was hit by section 23 of the Indian Contract Act.

Analysis: The licence for sale of country liquor stood in the name of one partner, was not transferred to the firm, and the business continued to be managed by that partner, while the other partner was only a financing partner. The relevant excise condition required prior permission before taking a person as partner, but the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950 provided for consequences by way of fine under section 58 and cancellation of licence under section 34. The absence of prior permission, by itself, did not show that the law prohibited formation of the partnership. On the facts, the authorities had not cancelled the licence or imposed any penalty, and the arrangement did not amount to an agreement forbidden by law or opposed to public policy.

Conclusion: The partnership was valid in law and was entitled to registration; the objection under section 23 of the Indian Contract Act failed.

Final Conclusion: The Revenue's challenge to the grant of registration was rejected and the order directing registration of the firm was sustained.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an excise law merely prescribes penalties for breach of licence conditions and does not declare a partnership void, formation of a partnership without prior permission does not by itself render the firm illegal if the licence is not transferred and the business is carried on under the licence of the partner in whose name it stands.

---