Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's appeal against a penalty order passed by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was maintainable notwithstanding the statutory change with effect from 1 April 1976, and whether the penalty order was jurisdiction.
Analysis: The assessment order recording the Income-tax Officer's satisfaction about concealment was passed before the change in law, and penalty proceedings had already been initiated on that basis. On that footing, the lis for levy of penalty had commenced before the curtailment of jurisdiction. The right of appeal is a vested right accruing when proceedings commence, and it is governed by the law then in force unless taken away expressly or by necessary implication. As the relevant proceedings were pending when the law changed, the assessee's appellate right before the Tribunal survived, and the order imposing penalty by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner, who lacked jurisdiction after the change, could not stand.
Conclusion: The penalty order was without jurisdiction and was liable to be cancelled; the assessee's main appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Where penalty proceedings originate before a statutory change curtailing the authority's power, the assessee retains the vested right of appeal under the pre-existing law, and a penalty order passed thereafter by an lacking jurisdiction is invalid.