Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1992 (5) TMI 70 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tax Appeals Outcome: Partial win for assessee, disallowances upheld, some additions deleted The Department's appeal was dismissed, and the assessee's appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld disallowances for the addition of Rs. 10,00,000 ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                            Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                              Tax Appeals Outcome: Partial win for assessee, disallowances upheld, some additions deleted

                              The Department's appeal was dismissed, and the assessee's appeal was partly allowed. The Tribunal upheld disallowances for the addition of Rs. 10,00,000 in the trading account, disallowance of depreciation, inclusion of service charges under 'entertainment expenditure,' and disallowance on account of personal use of vehicle. However, the Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 1,12,782 related to the discrepancy in the quantity of goods dispatched between godowns.




                              Issues Involved:
                              1. Addition of Rs. 10,00,000 in the trading account.
                              2. Discrepancy in the quantity of goods dispatched between godowns.
                              3. Difference in rolling charges paid to sister concerns.
                              4. Disallowance of depreciation in respect of machinery.
                              5. Inclusion of service charges under the head 'entertainment expenditure.'
                              6. Disallowance on account of personal use of vehicle.

                              Detailed Analysis:

                              1. Addition of Rs. 10,00,000 in the Trading Account:
                              The ITO rejected the book results of the assessee and applied the provisions of Section 145, estimating the sales and making an addition of Rs. 10,00,000 in the trading account. This was based on discrepancies found in the stock registers, specifically the mismatch in the quantities dispatched from Shahdara godown to Ghaziabad godown. The ITO also noted differences in rolling charges paid to two sister concerns, which were not satisfactorily explained by the assessee.

                              2. Discrepancy in the Quantity of Goods Dispatched Between Godowns:
                              The ITO found discrepancies in the quantities recorded in the godown registers. On 3rd March 1982, the Ghaziabad godown register showed a receipt of 98.850 MT from Shahdara, but the Shahdara register only showed a dispatch of 75.510 MT. The assessee explained that the remaining 23.340 MT was dispatched from another register that was not traceable. The CIT(A) sustained an addition of Rs. 1,12,782 for this discrepancy, as the assessee failed to produce the supporting register. However, the Tribunal found that other evidence, such as sale books and purchase vouchers, supported the assessee's claim that the total quantity of 98.850 MT was indeed sold to Rathi Udyog Ltd. Therefore, the addition was deleted.

                              3. Difference in Rolling Charges Paid to Sister Concerns:
                              The ITO noted that the assessee paid different rolling charges to two sister concerns: Rs. 550 per MT to Rathi Udyog Ltd. and Rs. 625 per MT to G.D. Rathi. The assessee explained that the difference was due to the varying diameters of the bars rolled. The CIT(A) found that the ITO's conclusion was based on insufficient information and that the rolling charges paid were justified. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A), noting that the rolling charges paid to other concerns were even higher, and there was no evidence to disprove the assessee's explanation.

                              4. Disallowance of Depreciation in Respect of Machinery:
                              This ground was not pressed by the assessee and was dismissed.

                              5. Inclusion of Service Charges Under the Head 'Entertainment Expenditure':
                              The ITO disallowed Rs. 22,324 under Section 37(2A), which included Rs. 25,411 paid to Shri B.L. Chopra for sales promotion services. The CIT(A) upheld this disallowance, noting the absence of a written agreement or evidence of services rendered. The Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A), finding no basis to allow the claim under Section 37(2A).

                              6. Disallowance on Account of Personal Use of Vehicle:
                              The ITO disallowed one-fourth of the vehicle maintenance expenses, as the directors did not own personal vehicles, implying personal use of company vehicles. The CIT(A) confirmed this disallowance. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere with this decision, as the personal use of the vehicle was not denied by the assessee.

                              Conclusion:
                              The appeal by the Department was dismissed, and the appeal by the assessee was partly allowed. The Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 1,12,782 related to the discrepancy in the quantity of goods dispatched but upheld the other disallowances made by the CIT(A).
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found