Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether recovery of the outstanding tax demand should be stayed pending disposal of the appeal, and whether the appeal should be fixed for early hearing on conditions.
Analysis: The Tribunal took note of the assessee's financial position, the absence of any offered security, and the existence of sundry debtors and liabilities. Balancing the need for protection of the Revenue with the pendency of the appeal, it considered that an out-of-turn hearing could be directed on payment of a part of the demand in instalments, while also safeguarding the assessee against immediate coercive recovery for a limited period.
Conclusion: The demand was stayed up to 30 November 1994, the appeal was directed to be heard in the third week of November 1994 on payment of Rs. 1 lakh in two instalments, and the stay was liable to be vacated if the assessee sought adjournment without reasonable cause.