TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Contractor's Reported Income Upheld Over Higher Estimate in Tax Appeal Decision</h1> <h3>Income-Tax Officer. Versus RB. Chy Ruchi Ram Khattar And Sons.</h3> Income-Tax Officer. Versus RB. Chy Ruchi Ram Khattar And Sons. - ITD 036, 276, Issues:1. Assessment of income based on estimates by the Income Tax Officer (ITO) for a building contractor.2. Rejection of book results by the ITO due to discrepancies in accounting methods and work in progress estimation.3. Appeal to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) against the ITO's estimate.4. Arguments presented by the Departmental Representative and the counsel for the assessee before the CIT(Appeals).5. Application of Section 145 in contractor cases for estimating work in progress and profits.6. Disagreement between the ITO and the CIT(Appeals) regarding the reasonableness of the income estimate.7. Consideration of past records and gross profit rates in determining the reasonableness of the income estimate.Analysis:1. The case involves the assessment of income for a building contractor by the ITO based on estimates. The ITO found discrepancies in the assessee's accounts, leading to a rejection of the reported income and an estimate of Rs. 1,50,000, significantly higher than the Rs. 62,100 disclosed by the assessee.2. The ITO rejected the book results due to issues with work in progress estimation and lack of proper accounting records, such as the absence of a stock register. The ITO's estimate was based on discrepancies in closing stock valuation and receipts, leading to the higher income assessment.3. The assessee appealed to the CIT(Appeals) against the ITO's estimate, providing explanations for the discrepancies and arguing for the acceptance of the book results. The CIT(Appeals) reviewed the case and directed the ITO to accept the income as shown by the assessee.4. The Departmental Representative argued that the ITO's rejection of the book results was justified due to accounting irregularities and incomplete documentation. The counsel for the assessee countered, relying on past records and explanations for discrepancies to support the acceptance of the reported income.5. The judgment discusses the application of Section 145 in contractor cases for estimating work in progress and profits. It highlights the challenges in accurately determining work in progress for contractors compared to traders or manufacturers, emphasizing the need for estimation and approximation in such cases.6. The disagreement between the ITO and the CIT(Appeals) centered on the reasonableness of the income estimate. The ITO's estimate was deemed excessive and lacking proper basis, while the CIT(Appeals) considered past records and gross profit rates to support the acceptance of the reported income.7. The judgment underscores the importance of considering past records and gross profit rates in determining the reasonableness of income estimates. It criticizes the lack of proper basis and guidelines in the ITO's estimate, ultimately upholding the CIT(Appeals)' decision to accept the reported income based on past history and reasonable profit rates.
TaxTMI 