Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2008 (1) TMI 428 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appellate Tribunal allows full deduction under section 80-I, disregarding set-off of business losses The Appellate Tribunal ITAT COCHIN allowed the assessee's appeal regarding the deduction under section 80-I, holding that the Assessing Officer erred in ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Appellate Tribunal allows full deduction under section 80-I, disregarding set-off of business losses

                              The Appellate Tribunal ITAT COCHIN allowed the assessee's appeal regarding the deduction under section 80-I, holding that the Assessing Officer erred in restricting the deduction by setting off business losses from the previous year. The Tribunal emphasized that the deduction should be based solely on the profits and gains of the eligible business, as per statutory provisions, without reducing it by losses from prior assessments. The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order and directed the Assessing Officer to calculate the allowable deduction without considering the business loss for the assessment year 1995-96.




                              Issues:
                              1. Allowable deduction under section 80-I after setting off business loss for the assessment year 1995-96.
                              2. Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer to issue notice under section 148.

                              Issue 1: Allowable Deduction under Section 80-I after Setting off Business Loss for the Assessment Year 1995-96:

                              The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT COCHIN involved the question of whether the Assessing Officer was justified in calculating the allowable deduction under section 80-I of the Act after setting off the business loss for the assessment year 1995-96. The assessee, engaged in the production of plastic containers, initially claimed deduction under section 80-I for the assessment year 1996-97 without considering the business loss for the previous year. However, the Assessing Officer, based on an audit objection, reduced the profit by setting off the business loss for the assessment year 1995-96, thereby restricting the deduction.

                              During the proceedings, the learned senior counsel for the assessee argued that the Assessing Officer's refusal to carry forward the business loss for the assessment year 1995-96, due to a belatedly filed return, was unjustified. The counsel contended that the provisions of section 80-I did not warrant such reduction in profit while computing the deduction under section 80-IA. On the other hand, the Departmental representative supported the Assessing Officer's decision, citing the non obstante clause in section 80-IA(7) as overriding other provisions of the Act.

                              After considering the submissions and examining the relevant provisions, the Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) had misinterpreted the law. The Tribunal pointed out that section 80-IA(7) clearly stated that the deduction should be limited to the profits and gains from the eligible business, without allowing the reduction of profit by setting off business losses from previous years. The Tribunal emphasized that the Assessing Officer's denial to carry forward the business loss did not justify restricting the allowable deduction under section 80-I. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order and directed the Assessing Officer to calculate the allowable deduction without considering the business loss for the assessment year 1995-96.

                              Issue 2: Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer to Issue Notice under Section 148:

                              The assessee also raised the issue of the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer to issue a notice under section 148. However, since the Tribunal resolved the appeal based on the merits of the deduction issue, it did not delve into the jurisdiction matter raised by the assessee. Therefore, the Tribunal did not provide a detailed analysis or ruling on the jurisdictional aspect, as the decision on the deduction issue rendered further consideration unnecessary.

                              In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal ITAT COCHIN allowed the assessee's appeal, primarily focusing on the correct interpretation of the provisions related to allowable deductions under section 80-I without setting off business losses from previous years. The Tribunal emphasized that the deduction should be based on the profits and gains of the eligible business, as specified in the relevant statutory provisions, and not reduced by setting off losses from prior assessments.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found