TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the executors were entitled to claim exemption under section 5(1)(i) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 in respect of the residuary estate on the relevant valuation dates; (ii) Whether the property comprised in the estate had vested in the charitable trust so that it could be assessed in the hands of the executors as trustees rather than as executors.
Issue (i): Whether the executors were entitled to claim exemption under section 5(1)(i) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 in respect of the residuary estate on the relevant valuation dates.
Analysis: The residuary legatee acquires no complete interest until the residue is ascertained and the executor assents to the legacy. The executors had themselves returned and been assessed as executors, and the property had not been shown as belonging to the trust in its books. Mere payment of estate duty did not divest the executors or transfer the assets to the charitable trust. On the relevant valuation dates, no assent or appropriation in favour of the trust had been established.
Conclusion: The claim to exemption under section 5(1)(i) was not available to the executors on the relevant valuation dates.
Issue (ii): Whether the property comprised in the estate had vested in the charitable trust so that it could be assessed in the hands of the executors as trustees rather than as executors.
Analysis: Under the law of succession, the executor holds the estate until assent to the legacy, and until distribution or assent the asset remains assessable in the hands of the executor. The relevant wealth-tax and income-tax provisions treated undistributed estate assets as chargeable in the hands of the executor, not as trust property. Since the assets had not been distributed to or applied for the trust before the valuation dates, the executors continued to hold them in that capacity.
Conclusion: The property was assessable in the hands of the executors and not as property vested in the charitable trust.
Final Conclusion: The assessments made by the Wealth-tax Officer were valid and the cancellation ordered by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner was unsustainable; the departmental appeals succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Until a residuary estate is ascertained and the executor assents to the legacy, the property remains vested in the executor and is assessable in that capacity, not as trust property eligible for exemption.
TaxTMI 
