1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal rejects assessee's goodwill valuation, treats excess as short-term gains</h1> The Tribunal upheld the valuation of goodwill at Rs. 4,32,000, rejecting the assessee's claim of Rs. 5,20,000. Additionally, the excess amount of Rs. ... A Firm, A Partner, Capital Gains Tax Issues:Valuation of Goodwill and treatment of excess amount as short-term capital gains.Valuation of Goodwill:The case involved the valuation of goodwill received by the assessee on the sale of his business. The assessee claimed the value of goodwill at Rs. 5,20,000, while the ITO estimated it at Rs. 4,32,000 using the 'capitalisation of super profits' method. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the ITO's valuation, considering the business's progression and the exclusive ownership of goodwill by the assessee. The Tribunal found the ITO's valuation to be appropriate and rejected the argument that only the firm's profits should be considered for valuing goodwill. The Tribunal upheld the valuation of goodwill at Rs. 4,32,000.Treatment of Excess Amount as Short-term Capital Gains:The excess amount of Rs. 88,000 received by the assessee was attributed by the ITO as compensation for the rise in the market value of the leasehold rights transferred to the company. The Tribunal agreed with the ITO's reasoning, stating that the transfer of the leasehold rights within three years of acquisition justified treating the amount as 'short-term' capital gains. The Tribunal confirmed the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and upheld the assessment of the excess amount as short-term capital gains. The Tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal, affirming the decisions on both valuation of goodwill and treatment of the excess amount as capital gains.This summary outlines the valuation of goodwill and the treatment of the excess amount as short-term capital gains in the context of the sale of the business. The Tribunal upheld the ITO's valuation methodology and decision regarding the excess amount, ultimately dismissing the assessee's appeal.