CESTAT Mumbai: Additional Duty & Penalties Set Aside on Fabric Processing; Alleged Clandestine Removal Justified The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demand of additional duty and penalties imposed by the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CESTAT Mumbai: Additional Duty & Penalties Set Aside on Fabric Processing; Alleged Clandestine Removal Justified
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demand of additional duty and penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai. The tribunal accepted the argument that the alleged clandestine removal was actually a permissible shrinkage during fabric processing, within the tolerance limit. The orders of Central Excise authorities supporting this were also considered.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellants, setting aside the demand of additional duty and penalties imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai. The tribunal accepted the argument that the alleged clandestine removal was actually a permissible shrinkage during fabric processing, within the tolerance limit. The orders of Central Excise authorities supporting this were also considered.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
