Charitable medical import without licence may justify leniency, with redemption fine reduced and penalty set aside.

Unauthorised import of old medical equipment without an import licence was not disputed, but the importer was a charitable hospital and the goods were intended for medical service and healthcare improvement rather than commercial gain. On that factual basis, a lenient view was taken in relation to confiscatory consequences and monetary sanctions. The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 5,000 and the penalty was set aside, reflecting that charitable end use may justify reduction or waiver of penalties where illicit import is otherwise established.

---

---

Issues: Whether the unauthorised import of old medical equipment without the required import licence justified confiscation, redemption fine and penalty, and whether leniency was warranted in the facts of the case.

Analysis: The import of the medical equipment without an import licence was not disputed. The importer, however, was a charitable hospital, and the goods were intended for medical service and improvement of healthcare facilities rather than commercial gain. In these circumstances, and keeping in view the nature of the import and the charitable character of the appellant, a lenient view was considered appropriate.

Conclusion: The redemption fine was reduced to Rs. 5,000 and the penalty was set aside.

Ratio Decidendi: Where unauthorised import is established but the import is for charitable medical use and not for commercial gain, the adjudicating authority may adopt a lenient view and reduce or waive monetary penalties.

---