Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether nacelle body, towers, lattice structures and masts manufactured for wind mills were classifiable as general structurals under Heading 73.08 or were entitled to exemption as parts of wind mills under Notification No. 205/88-C.E. dated 25-5-88.
Analysis: The dispute turned on the functional character of the goods and whether they were specially designed for wind mills. The Tribunal accepted that the items were manufactured according to specific wind mill designs and specifications, and that the wind mill could not be erected or function without these supporting components. Reliance was placed on the earlier Tribunal view that a wind operated generator is not complete without the tower and related components, and the photographs on record also supported the finding that the disputed items were not general-purpose structurals but wind mill-specific parts.
Conclusion: The disputed items were held to be parts of wind mills and eligible for exemption under Notification No. 205/88-C.E.; the Revenue's appeal was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods specially designed and manufactured for a wind mill, without which the wind mill cannot be erected or function, are to be treated as parts of the wind mill and not as mere general structurals for the purpose of exemption.