Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether M.S. Forged Flanges, manufactured and supplied as parts/spares of wind mill towers, were eligible for exemption under Notification No. 6/2000-CE as non-conventional energy devices/systems.
Analysis: The Tribunal followed the decision in the respondent's own case and held that the wind mill tower is itself a part of the wind operated electrical generator, and that a flange used in the tower is therefore a part of that system. It was further accepted that the exemption could not be denied merely because the tower was assembled at site, and that the department could not restrict the expression "consumed in the factory of production" so narrowly as to defeat the exemption. The earlier decision also supported the assessee on bona fide belief and absence of suppression, in the light of the departmental circular requiring scrutiny of declarations.
Conclusion: The goods were held eligible for exemption under Notification No. 6/2000-CE, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.