Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether iron or steel towers manufactured and cleared as such from the factory were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 205/88-C.E. as parts of windmills.
Analysis: The exemption covered windmills and specially designed devices running on windmills, and also parts consumed within the factory of production for manufacture of such specified goods. The towers in question were not captively consumed in the manufacture of windmills in the same factory, nor were windmills cleared from the factory in SKD/CKD condition or otherwise. The fact that the towers were later used by buyers as components of windmills was held insufficient to attract the exemption. The notification was construed as benefiting manufacturers of the final non-conventional energy device and, incidentally, the parts used captively in its manufacture.
Conclusion: The towers were not eligible for exemption under the notification, and the Revenue's appeal succeeded.
Final Conclusion: Exemption under the notification was denied because the cleared goods were only towers and not parts captively used in the manufacture of windmills.
Ratio Decidendi: Exemption for parts under the notification is available only when the parts are manufactured and captively consumed in the same factory for manufacture of the specified exempted device, not when they are merely cleared as standalone goods for later use by the buyer.