Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Modvat credit originally taken on capital goods could be denied when the goods were destroyed in fire but were later salvaged and cleared on payment of duty in accordance with the applicable Cenvat provisions.
Analysis: The capital goods had been validly brought into use and credit had been taken in accordance with the Modvat scheme. On subsequent salvage and clearance, the manufacturer paid duty on the sale value of the goods, and the governing rule permitted removal of capital goods as such on payment of duty at the rate and value prescribed under the Central Excise Act. Since the clearance was made on payment of the duty attributable to the goods, denial of the credit originally availed was not justified.
Conclusion: Denial of Modvat credit on the capital goods was unsustainable and the demand and penalty related to those capital goods were set aside in favour of the assessee.