TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the Agastyar Trust was held wholly for religious or charitable purposes so as to satisfy section 4(3)(i) and enable deduction under section 15B of the Income-tax Act, 1922; (ii) whether the High Court exceeded the scope of the reference in examining the applicability of section 4(3)(i) to the trust.
Issue (i): Whether the Agastyar Trust was held wholly for religious or charitable purposes so as to satisfy section 4(3)(i) and enable deduction under section 15B of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The trust deed contained several objects, one of which authorised the manufacture, purchase, sale and distribution of pharmaceutical, medicinal, chemical and allied preparations. The deed also empowered the trustees to apply the trust property or income to any one of the objects in their discretion, without confining them to charitable objects. Since the income could lawfully be applied wholly to a non-charitable object, the trust property could not be said to be held under a trust wholly for religious or charitable purposes. The non-charitable object was not merely incidental to the charitable objects, but was an independent object capable of absorbing the entire income.
Conclusion: The trust did not satisfy section 4(3)(i), and the donation was not eligible for exemption under section 15B; the finding was against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Issue (ii): Whether the High Court exceeded the scope of the reference in examining the applicability of section 4(3)(i) to the trust.
Analysis: The reference and the Tribunal's order necessarily involved the question whether the trust income was exempt under section 4(3)(i), because eligibility for deduction under section 15B depended on that condition. The issue had been dealt with in the proceedings before the authorities below, and a question arising from the Tribunal's order could be examined by the High Court even if not separately formulated in the precise terms urged by the assessee.
Conclusion: The High Court acted within jurisdiction and did not travel beyond the reference; this point was against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The trust deed conferred an unrestricted power to apply income to both charitable and non-charitable objects, so the statutory condition for exemption was not met, and the challenge to the High Court's jurisdiction also failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a trust deed permits the trustees to apply the whole income to any of several objects, including a non-charitable object, the trust is not one held wholly for religious or charitable purposes and cannot claim exemption linked to that statutory condition.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
