Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, after the earlier appellate order remanded the matter only for redetermination of personal penalty, the later authorities could travel beyond that limited remit and whether the penalty of Rs. 1,09,870/- warranted interference.
Analysis: The earlier appellate order was treated as having finally confined further proceedings to the limited question of penalty. On that footing, the subsequent challenge to findings already concluded in the earlier round was held to be unwarranted, and the authorities below were regarded as functus officio except on the limited point of redetermination of penalty. The penalty was also found to relate to the short-landed drums identified by the party, leaving no basis to disturb the quantified amount.
Conclusion: The penalty was upheld and the challenge failed.