HC Bombay upholds penalty provision under Section 112, citing precedent The HC Bombay dismissed the appeal concerning a penalty under Section 112, upholding the provision as mandatory and citing precedent where the court ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
HC Bombay upholds penalty provision under Section 112, citing precedent
The HC Bombay dismissed the appeal concerning a penalty under Section 112, upholding the provision as mandatory and citing precedent where the court declined interference due to the absence of a legal question.
The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dismissed the appeal regarding a penalty under Section 112, citing a previous judgment where the court chose not to interfere as the question of law did not arise. The court found the provision to be mandatory, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.