Substantial question of law absent in CHA licence suspension challenge; Tribunal's jurisdictional order was left undisturbed.

The Tribunal's setting aside of suspension of a customs house agent licence under the 2004 Regulations was upheld because it acted within jurisdiction on the material before it and granted liberty to proceed with the regular enquiry. Appellate interference was unwarranted in the absence of patent illegality in the Tribunal's order. No substantial question of law was found to arise, so the challenge failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the setting aside of the suspension of the CHA licence under the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations, 2004 gave rise to any substantial question of law warranting interference in appeal.

Analysis: The Tribunal had acted within its jurisdiction on the material on record in setting aside the suspension order and had granted liberty to pursue the regular enquiry. Interference in the appellate jurisdiction was not justified unless the Tribunal's order suffered from patent illegality, which was not shown.

Conclusion: No substantial question of law arose for determination, and the appellate challenge to the Tribunal's order failed.

---