Pre-execution review of COFEPOSA detention turned on unexplained delay and ignored status report, rendering the order unsustainable.

Pre-execution judicial review of a COFEPOSA detention order is confined to narrow exceptions, including orders passed for a wrong purpose or on vague, extraneous, or irrelevant grounds. Undue and unexplained delay in passing the detention order may sever the live and proximate link between the alleged prejudicial activity and the preventive purpose, affecting subjective satisfaction. Non-consideration of a relevant Customs status report was also treated as a material defect. On these grounds, the detention order was held unsustainable and liable to be set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether the pre-execution detention order under COFEPOSA was liable to be quashed on the grounds of unexplained delay in issuance and non-consideration of a relevant status report.

Analysis: Pre-execution interference with a detention order is confined to narrow exceptions, including cases where the order is passed for a wrong purpose or on vague, extraneous, or irrelevant grounds. In preventive detention matters, undue and unexplained delay in passing the order may break the live and proximate link between the prejudicial activity and the detention purpose, thereby affecting the genuineness of subjective satisfaction. The Court also noted that a status report called for from the Customs Department had not been considered by the detaining authority, although it was said to contain material relevant to the decision whether detention was warranted. The absence of any explanation for the long delay, coupled with non-consideration of the status report, brought the case within the recognized exceptions for pre-execution judicial review.

Conclusion: The detention order was not sustainable and was liable to be set aside in favour of the appellant.

---