Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an application for reference under Section 45(1) of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 could be entertained beyond the further period of thirty days prescribed in the proviso, and whether Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applied to condone delay beyond that period.
Analysis: The proviso to Section 45(1) permits presentation of a reference application only within the initial sixty days and, on sufficient cause, within a further period not exceeding thirty days. This language is more restrictive than the analogous provisions considered in earlier decisions, which had already held that the Limitation Act was excluded beyond the special statute's condonable period. Section 62(2) of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 only makes Sections 4 and 12 of the Limitation Act applicable for computing the period; it does not extend the power to condone delay under Section 5. The statutory scheme therefore shows an express exclusion of Section 5 after expiry of the maximum period prescribed by the special Act.
Conclusion: Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 did not apply to extend the time beyond the further period of thirty days under Section 45(1) of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975. The reference application was barred by limitation, and the rejection by the Tribunal was upheld.
Final Conclusion: The special limitation regime under the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 controlled the reference proceedings and left no jurisdiction to condone delay beyond the maximum period expressly provided.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a special statute prescribes a definite outer limit for filing a proceeding and only a limited extension upon sufficient cause, the general power under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 stands excluded beyond that outer limit unless the special statute clearly provides otherwise.