Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the declaration filed under the amnesty scheme could be rejected without considering the pendency of the reference application and other relevant material placed on record.
Analysis: The declaration was declined on the footing that the appeal had been dismissed and, therefore, there was no dispute within the meaning of the scheme. The record showed that a reference application had been filed before the declaration, and the accompanying acknowledgment was produced, but this material aspect had not been seriously examined. Since the existence of a pending reference could materially affect eligibility under the scheme, the matter required fresh consideration after taking all relevant facts into account.
Conclusion: The rejection could not stand without reconsideration of the declaration in light of the pending reference and supporting material, and the matter was remitted for fresh decision according to law.
Final Conclusion: The petition succeeded to the extent of securing a remand for reconsideration of the declaration on the basis of all relevant facts and proof.
Ratio Decidendi: A declaration under a statutory amnesty scheme cannot be finally rejected without considering a material pending proceeding or other relevant evidence that may bear on eligibility.