Bail-condition reform requires prompt release mechanisms and reassessment where poverty prevents prisoners from furnishing bonds or sureties.

Measures for releasing prisoners who remain in custody after bail has been granted require coordinated action by prisons, District Legal Services Authorities and the e-prisons system. Bail orders should be promptly communicated and recorded, and prisoners not released within seven days should be automatically identified for follow-up. Legal-services support and socio-economic assessment should facilitate relaxation of unaffordable bail or surety conditions, while temporary bail may be considered where appropriate. Bail conditions should be reconsidered suo motu after one month, and local-surety requirements should be avoided. These measures aim to prevent continued detention solely because of poverty or inability to meet bail conditions.

---

---

Issues: Measures to secure the release of undertrial prisoners and convicts who remain in custody despite grant of bail because of inability to comply with bail or surety conditions.

Analysis: The continuing detention of persons granted bail due to poverty, inability to furnish bonds or sureties, and delayed institutional follow-up required a coordinated mechanism involving prisons, District Legal Services Authorities and the e-prisons software. Directions were formulated for prompt communication and recording of bail orders, automated identification of prisoners not released within seven days, legal-services assistance, socio-economic assessment for relaxation of conditions, consideration of temporary bail where appropriate, suo motu reconsideration of conditions after one month, and avoidance of local-surety conditions.

Outcome: Directions for execution of bail orders were issued; the matter was listed for further consideration.

---