Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an auction purchaser who knowingly attested a subsequent conveyance representing that the judgment-debtor owned the land was estopped from asserting title under the court auction, notwithstanding Section 317 of the Civil Procedure Code.
Analysis: The auction purchaser allowed the judgment-debtor to remain in possession for several years and, with knowledge of the recitals, attested the conveyance by which the plaintiff acquired title. Such attestation and acquiescence amounted to a representation that the auction purchaser asserted no adverse title, on which the purchaser under the conveyance was entitled to rely. Section 317 barred a suit founded on the assertion that the certified auction purchaser was merely a benamidar, but did not prevent application of estoppel where the plaintiff's title and possession could be sustained without proving the benami allegation. The subsequent procurement of a sale certificate in the auction purchaser's own name, after the attestation, was also treated as fraudulent within the saving in Section 317.
Conclusion: The auction purchaser was estopped from asserting title against the plaintiffs; the statutory bar did not defeat their claim.