TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned order-in-original should be quashed and the matter remanded for fresh consideration in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Mineral Area Development Authority and allied principles.
Analysis: The parties informed the Court that the governing issue had already been adjudicated by the Supreme Court. In view of the settled principles, the Court held that the order-in-original required to be set aside and the respondents were required to re-examine the matter afresh in accordance with the directions of the Supreme Court. The parties were left free to urge their stand regarding the show cause notice before the authority on remand.
Conclusion: The impugned order-in-original was quashed and set aside, and the matter was remanded to the respondents for fresh decision in accordance with law.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
