Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner, as holder of a non-transferable REP licence subject to actual user condition, could be penalised for misutilisation of goods imported and cleared through the licence holder's letter of authority.
Analysis: The licence permitted import of OGL items only for actual use and was expressly non-transferable. The goods were cleared under the petitioner's licence and were not shown to have been used in accordance with the licence conditions. The circumstance that the customs authorities treated the earlier import-related irregularity as a technical breach did not mean that the goods were confiscated or that the petitioner escaped responsibility for violation of the licence conditions. Since the imported goods were cleared under the petitioner's licence and no material was produced to show compliance with the actual user requirement, penal liability under the governing import control provisions was attracted.
Conclusion: The petitioner was liable for penalty for breach of the licence conditions, and the challenge to the penalty failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are cleared under a licence subject to actual user and non-transferability, the licence holder remains liable for contravention of the licence conditions and cannot avoid penalty merely because the immediate importation or clearance was effected by a letter of authority holder.