TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the vehicle, which was under a prohibitory order and subject to ongoing investigation, should be released to the petitioner pending further inquiry.
Analysis: The petition was filed under Article 226 seeking release of the vehicle. The matter was noted to be under active investigation, including scrutiny of the purchase and import transaction. On the documents produced, the Court found that a thorough investigation was warranted. Pending such investigation, custody of the vehicle was directed to be taken by the respondent officer and kept in safe custody, and the petitioner was directed to hand over the vehicle forthwith.
Conclusion: Release of the vehicle was declined at this stage and custody was directed to remain with the respondent during the pendency of the petition.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
