Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to provisional release of the imported goods detained by Customs pending adjudication.
Analysis: The goods were detained for alleged non-production of a BIS certificate and DGFT authorisation. The relief sought was identical to that granted in an earlier batch of writ petitions involving similar imports, where directions had already been issued for provisional release on conditions. Following the same approach, the Court directed the Customs Department to pass orders for provisional release within four weeks, impose suitable conditions, and release the goods within two weeks after compliance.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to provisional release of the detained goods on conditions, subject to final adjudication by Customs.