Tribunal discretion on adjournment and pre-deposit upheld; no denial of proper opportunity found in review proceedings.

The challenge concerned the Tribunal's refusal to adjourn, the direction to make a pre-deposit, and the dismissal of the review application on the alleged ground of denial of proper opportunity. On examining both orders, the HC found no infirmity in the Tribunal's exercise of discretion or in the manner in which the matter was handled. The court therefore rejected the challenge and dismissed the petition.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Tribunal's order directing pre-deposit and the subsequent order dismissing the review application suffered from any infirmity on the ground of lack of proper opportunity.

Analysis: The challenge was confined to the Tribunal's refusal to adjourn and the alleged denial of opportunity before passing the order on pre-deposit and the review order. On examining both orders, the Court found no infirmity in the Tribunal's exercise of discretion or in the manner in which the matter was dealt with.

Conclusion: The challenge was rejected and the petition was dismissed.

---