Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sales recorded by the assessee for the relevant assessment years were bogus and whether the profit shown on such sales could be treated as income from other sources with denial of deduction under section 80IB.
Analysis: Enquiries made by the Assessing Officer revealed that some of the alleged purchasers denied transactions with the assessee, while notices issued to other alleged purchasers under section 133(6) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 returned unserved. The assessee did not furnish a satisfactory explanation to rebut these findings. The appellate authority further found that the receipts against the alleged sales were shown either in cash below the prescribed threshold or through demand drafts purchased in cash in a manner suggesting fabrication of sales and inflation of profits to claim excessive deduction under section 80IB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found no material to dislodge these factual findings.
Conclusion: The sales were rightly treated as bogus, the profit thereon was correctly assessed as income from other sources, and deduction under section 80IB was rightly denied on such amounts.