Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the condition imposed by the High Court requiring deposit of Rs.1 crore should be stayed pending the petition and whether the deposit may be furnished in the form of a bank guarantee.
Analysis: The petitioner offered to furnish the deposit directed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate and upheld by the High Court in the form of a bank guarantee. In view of that undertaking, notice was issued returnable within four weeks and the operation of the High Court order insofar as approval of the condition of deposit of Rs.1 crore was stayed for the four week period. No coercive steps are to be taken against the petitioner during that period.
Conclusion: The High Court order is stayed insofar as the requirement to deposit Rs.1 crore; the petitioner is permitted to furnish the deposit by way of a bank guarantee within four weeks and no coercive action shall be taken in that period.