Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Assessing Officer's ex-parte estimation of net profit at 15% (in the absence of the assessee's return and documentary evidence) was justified, or whether the Appellate Authority was correct in accepting the assessee's declared net profit rate of 8.5%.
Analysis: The matter concerns an ex-parte assessment made when the assessee did not file a return or appear before the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer applied an estimated net profit rate of 15% without contemporaneous documentary justification. The Appellate Authority accepted the assessee's declared net profit rate of 8.5% as being consistent with civil contracting norms and found the Assessing Officer's estimation to be arbitrary rather than a rational, fair assessment.
Conclusion: The Assessing Officer's estimation at 15% is not sustained; the Appellate Authority's acceptance of the assessee's net profit rate of 8.5% is upheld.